Well I am aware I always start my appearance at Yoko's new forum with some complaints and - what a surprise - I have one just ready to be written down :)
Well I know it does take a lot of effort to develop Injection, it is for free and everyone just yells what should and could be done, but... it is still software and there are some (very useful) rules to obey when you make a bit of one.
Lets take a look what I'm relly talking about. I just downloaded latest injection.dll to see what changed and... well ar first I just CAN'T find out WHAT version is that ment to be - "40?.? (4Angelo)" tells less then nothing. Well I can live with it, but, where are the changelogs? I got used to changelogs via html, I got used to changelogs published only at the forum, but I am really curious where I should look for it now? In local newspaper? :D
Thanks to all who have read till now. If there is anybody among them who does have acces to either source, or anything what looks like changelog, could you, please, let us know what can I see behind the kilobytes of executable code added to the DLL ?
I am aware of reasons why Injection is "not-as-open-source-as-it-should-be", but despite this it would be quite a nonsense to make users do all the reverse-engineering stuff to find out what actually changed...
PS: If it is such huge amount of time to write down theese few lines I can do this in my free time provided I am given at least some lines of the source .... you know what specific ones I mean.
Yoko injection versions, changelogs
Moderators: Murderator+, Murderator
lol 
did you want so long answer so lang your question?
neither i have time to write down, edit and publish local newspaper, nor much wish in that.
The versions 4?.? are published in 2004 year (number 4) where it is declared that developement is stopped through issues widely discussed before. Any archeologist may download old forum archive to research it.
The ?.? means that this version will not be described widely.
The fact of that it is uploaded means injection will be not worse if you download it, because some issues may be fixed.
the name in brackets (ZD), (Angelo) etc means for whom extended functionality was developed. For example 4ZD version contains fixes for uo.Trade* functions. All changes cumulative.
Resume. You may look at 4?.? versions as last published and described versions 312.*
did you want so long answer so lang your question?
neither i have time to write down, edit and publish local newspaper, nor much wish in that.
The versions 4?.? are published in 2004 year (number 4) where it is declared that developement is stopped through issues widely discussed before. Any archeologist may download old forum archive to research it.
The ?.? means that this version will not be described widely.
The fact of that it is uploaded means injection will be not worse if you download it, because some issues may be fixed.
the name in brackets (ZD), (Angelo) etc means for whom extended functionality was developed. For example 4ZD version contains fixes for uo.Trade* functions. All changes cumulative.
Resume. You may look at 4?.? versions as last published and described versions 312.*
That means, if I want to use anything added in 2004 i have to use reverse engineering? Could you at least ask those who contributed changes whether they are willing to share it with the rest of what used to be community... ?
Or if I want some improvements and changes I do have to add my own code and send it to you and you will compile it in cumulative way to all previous additions and all users will have version with extended functionality which is absolutely useless to them since they don't know WHAT it is?
Well this won't stop abusing long known inj-base sources to make and utilize packet-based cheats. I kind of a way understand why you don't want to release sources, but I just can't help myself when I see how absurd can this attitude turn ...
Or if I want some improvements and changes I do have to add my own code and send it to you and you will compile it in cumulative way to all previous additions and all users will have version with extended functionality which is absolutely useless to them since they don't know WHAT it is?
Well this won't stop abusing long known inj-base sources to make and utilize packet-based cheats. I kind of a way understand why you don't want to release sources, but I just can't help myself when I see how absurd can this attitude turn ...
some changes was serial-protected, so even if you know it you can not use it. others are bug-fixes, so you not need much to know about them, they just make injection work ok. the rest is not important ones. i will told about one: command ,mfgi clear/info/add type [x y z] [color] [title]
experiment if you wish...
experiment if you wish...